| *** Osso has joined #circuits-dev | 01:04 | |
| prologic | hey Osso | 01:11 |
|---|---|---|
| prologic | Good news :) | 01:11 |
| prologic | We're ready to release | 01:11 |
| Osso | hello! | 01:11 |
| Osso | oh what happened ? | 01:11 |
| prologic | I fixed everything :) | 01:11 |
| prologic | well sort of | 01:11 |
| Osso | wow! | 01:11 |
| prologic | CHeck PT for the new stories/bugs | 01:11 |
| prologic | There are a few known issues we need to iron out in a 2.1.1 or such | 01:12 |
| prologic | but I'm happy with the current state | 01:12 |
| Osso | my story for parse_body got accepted but there's no comment on it | 01:13 |
| Osso | let me check | 01:13 |
| prologic | no there isn't | 01:15 |
| prologic | but I fixed the remaining unicode issue we had | 01:15 |
| prologic | mehere did work on that too | 01:16 |
| prologic | so between the two of us I think we sorted it :) | 01:16 |
| prologic | at least all tests pass now on OS X | 01:16 |
| prologic | Windows | 01:16 |
| prologic | and Linux | 01:16 |
| prologic | with the exception of the comments in code I made | 01:16 |
| prologic | and the two bugs I filed | 01:16 |
| prologic | bt they're very specific | 01:16 |
| Osso | changing it to BytesIO fixed? nice! | 01:20 |
| Osso | so both open bugs are windows related | 01:22 |
| prologic | yes | 01:23 |
| prologic | and very specific at that | 01:23 |
| prologic | and one pypy bug | 01:23 |
| prologic | but not really our problem - but we should investigate why/how | 01:24 |
| prologic | and report to pypy | 01:24 |
| Osso | well that's nice | 01:25 |
| prologic | yeah :) | 01:37 |
| prologic | 2.1.0 is is pretty good shape I think | 01:37 |
| prologic | mehere's stuff all works nicely | 01:37 |
| prologic | going to upgrade to 2.1.0dev on my servers soon | 01:37 |
| prologic | So Osso/mehere | 01:48 |
| prologic | Aside from the fact we need more networking protocols | 01:49 |
| prologic | and a good standard (in terms of circuits) way of building new ones | 01:49 |
| prologic | My plans for the future with circuits involves some of the following | 01:49 |
| prologic | distributed computing apis | 01:49 |
| prologic | cloud computing apis | 01:49 |
| prologic | with runnable node to form clusters | 01:49 |
| prologic | ofc this may end up being a separate project/package | 01:50 |
| prologic | circuits.cloud | 01:50 |
| prologic | circuits.distributed | 01:50 |
| prologic | for example | 01:50 |
| prologic | Also speaking of | 01:50 |
| prologic | What are your thoughts on replacing circuits.web.wrappers with webob? | 01:51 |
| prologic | webob sesms to be used by many other web frameworks | 01:51 |
| Osso | that's a lot more code | 01:59 |
| prologic | what is? | 02:04 |
| Osso | webop | 02:15 |
| Osso | the problem is we don't have dependencies | 02:16 |
| Osso | so we'd have to include it in circuits no ? | 02:16 |
| prologic | yes | 03:02 |
| prologic | you saying that webob is a bit on the large size? | 03:02 |
| prologic | and has features we don't need? | 03:02 |
| prologic | Osso, hmmm you are right | 03:14 |
| prologic | WebOb is many modules | 03:14 |
| prologic | and thousands of loc | 03:14 |
| prologic | forget it :) | 03:14 |
| Osso | maybe we features we could use | 04:05 |
| Osso | it would be perfect if we could just import it | 04:05 |
| Osso | but let's just keep the request like this for now :) | 04:06 |
| Osso | bbl ~ | 04:07 |
| *** mehere has quit IRC | 05:31 | |
| *** mehere has joined #circuits-dev | 05:40 | |
| *** Osso has quit IRC | 10:12 | |
| *** anunnaki has quit IRC | 10:27 | |
| *** anunnaki has joined #circuits-dev | 11:11 | |
| *** anunnaki has quit IRC | 13:55 | |
| *** anunnaki has joined #circuits-dev | 13:56 | |
| *** koobs has quit IRC | 19:18 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.11.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!