IRC Logs for #crux-devel Tuesday, 2009-03-31

*** sepen has joined #crux-devel01:11
*** Rotwang has joined #crux-devel02:21
*** Rotwang has quit IRC02:31
*** Rotwang has joined #crux-devel02:31
*** Rotwang has quit IRC03:10
nipuLrehabdoll: it's better to keep all ports03:45
nipuLeven if they are the same as i68603:46
nipuLtilman: any particular reason to use bools as return values for the pkg_databse operations in the pkgutils6 branch?03:50
nipuLrather than return codes?05:09
*** pedja has quit IRC05:15
*** pedja has joined #crux-devel05:16
rehabdollnipuL: ive kept all ports that only needs a new footprint05:49
rehabdollit would be nice if ports that builds fine on both arch's could be merged when doing a ports -u or something05:49
rehabdollmerged with arch-specific ports that is05:52
nipuLi still think it's better that you keep all ports, it points out that the port has obviously been tested against the arch06:32
nipuLand when mainline ports upgrade it gives the arch maintainers a chance to verify the port aswell06:33
*** pedja has quit IRC09:29
*** pedja has joined #crux-devel09:33
*** sepen has quit IRC10:07
*** sepen has joined #crux-devel11:20
tilmannipuL: no, we'll probably have to use a bunch of different return codes at some point11:29
*** mike_k has joined #crux-devel11:48
*** jue has joined #crux-devel12:04
*** Rotwang has joined #crux-devel12:26
juerehabdoll: I agree with nipuL, IMO not a good idea to remove all the ports16:30
*** Rotwang has quit IRC16:48
*** jue has quit IRC16:56
*** mike_k has quit IRC17:13
*** pitillo has joined #crux-devel17:30
*** sepen has quit IRC18:55

Generated by 2.11.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at!