| *** Feksclaus has quit IRC | 01:01 | |
| *** mavrick61 has quit IRC | 03:25 | |
| *** mavrick61 has joined #crux-devel | 03:26 | |
| *** crash_ has quit IRC | 10:22 | |
| *** crash_ has joined #crux-devel | 10:25 | |
| *** Romster has quit IRC | 11:02 | |
| *** Romster has joined #crux-devel | 11:02 | |
| *** Feksclaus has joined #crux-devel | 12:51 | |
| *** Romster has quit IRC | 13:17 | |
| *** Romster has joined #crux-devel | 13:18 | |
| jaeger | looks like openssl will get an update tomorrow for the latest security issues | 15:17 |
|---|---|---|
| jue | Romster: mesa 10.5.1 is out, works fine for me here | 16:11 |
| jaeger | jue: are we thinking about removing tcp_wrappers in 3.2? I would like to do that if it isn't on the radar yet :) | 16:21 |
| jue | jaeger: well, we had several request to do so | 16:39 |
| jue | I'm not against tcp_wrapper and use them for internal LAN usage | 16:40 |
| jue | I know teK_ is using them too ... | 16:40 |
| jaeger | I'd prefer just to use iptables, myself. I can disable them on my own if need be, though | 16:40 |
| jue | but I have a neutral position here, if we remove them it's ok for me | 16:41 |
| jue | sure, tcp_wrappers is a ancient technology and most people have problem using it | 16:43 |
| jaeger | fair enough. We can come back to it when 3.2 discussions happen and see what the consensus is | 16:43 |
| jue | that's fine, unfortunately we cannot edit our wiki currently so we have to wait with a TODO32 until teK_ has the time to fix it | 16:44 |
| jaeger | I'll take a look at the wiki and see if I can fix that as well | 16:49 |
| jue | great, thanks | 16:53 |
| jue | the issue is somehow related to the changes done lately | 16:54 |
| jaeger | probably the SSL cert thing, that's what broke the mailing lists as well | 16:56 |
| jaeger | ok, seems to be working now | 17:07 |
| frinnst | yeah I prefer iptables too | 17:07 |
| frinnst | oh, new openssh | 17:07 |
| jaeger | there's a lot of old stuff on the wiki... like Main/ServerMigration | 17:11 |
| jue | jaeger: yeah, wiki works again | 18:04 |
| jue | jaeger: many thanks :) | 18:04 |
| jaeger | no problem | 18:24 |
| jaeger | prologic: is there any strong reason other than personal preference to choose devicemapper, btrfs, or aufs for docker storage? | 18:26 |
| jaeger | (aside from aufs kernel patching) | 18:26 |
| *** jue has joined #crux-devel | 20:00 | |
| frinnst | personal preference seems to override everything in most cases | 20:03 |
| frinnst | thats why i'd recommend btrfs :p | 20:03 |
| jaeger | :) | 20:09 |
| jaeger | frinnst: do you use it on lvm devs or files or raw devs or something else entirely? | 20:10 |
| prologic | jaeger, differing features and performance | 20:36 |
| prologic | jaeger, also aufs is not part of the upstream kernel | 20:36 |
| prologic | so that may sway your decision | 20:36 |
| prologic | the default is devmapper with ext4 file systems | 20:37 |
| prologic | jaeger, I would just go with devmapper on ssd disks tbh | 20:37 |
| *** Lukc has joined #crux-devel | 21:06 | |
| frinnst | raw devices only | 21:15 |
| frinnst | see little point in using it on anything else | 21:15 |
| jaeger | I could see using something else if you don't have an extra drive available for it, I guess | 21:18 |
| jaeger | or partition | 21:19 |
| frinnst | sure, if you want to play with the features | 22:14 |
| frinnst | but if you want to *use* the features, i'd recommend a disk or two | 22:14 |
| frinnst | I also like to use hyberbole :) | 22:15 |
| jaeger | For me it'd just be playing so probably doesn't matter | 22:15 |
| jaeger | heh | 22:15 |
| jaeger | I don't have anything set up, though, was just reading | 22:15 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.11.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!