IRC Logs for #crux-devel Wednesday, 2016-08-10

*** onodera has quit IRC01:49
*** _________mavric6 has quit IRC02:27
*** _________mavric6 has joined #crux-devel02:28
*** nebg has joined #crux-devel07:06
*** nebg has left #crux-devel ("Leaving")07:22
*** tvaalen has quit IRC11:54
teK__frinnst: I remember considering this, also. Have to rethink, why I dindt..12:15
teK__excluding should be doable from a technical POV12:15
teK__did you have issues because it is included?12:16
teK__I think it should be okay to not include it because we verify the source tarball and the Pkgfile. If the source tarball is not malicious (containing some code to target poor CRUXers), this woul suffice. On the other hand, I do not see the harm in checking the footprint file12:17
frinnstjust thinking about how a "user" would react when he got a footprint missmatch12:28
frinnstand what he would have to do to still install the port12:28
teK__A: not fiddling with .footprint?12:29
frinnstits probably common some users do like this:12:35
frinnstcd <port>12:35
frinnstpkgmk -d12:35
frinnstpkgmk -uf && pkgmk -u12:35
teK__with pkgmk inbetween ;)12:36
teK__yeah, but it's not required -uf is completely useless if you're not a dev12:36
frinnstyep, true12:36
teK__and yes I know the reflex to do -uf ..12:36
teK__still: nonsense :P12:37
*** onodera has joined #crux-devel14:00
*** nthwyatt has joined #crux-devel15:26
*** nthwyatt has left #crux-devel ()15:28
*** nebg has joined #crux-devel18:02
*** onodera has quit IRC20:16
*** onodera has joined #crux-devel20:22
*** deus_ex has joined #crux-devel22:15

Generated by 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at!